Back to blog
Unified APIIndustry insights

Merge and Apideck Pricing Compared

In this deep dive, we compare Merge’s customer-based and per-connection pricing with Apideck’s usage-based model—and show how the differences impact your margins, scalability, and engineering strategy. With real-world examples, savings breakdowns, and myths debunked, you’ll walk away with a clear picture of which model aligns with your growth goals

Kateryna Poryvay

Kateryna Poryvay

10 min read
Merge and Apideck Pricing Compared

Choosing the right Unified API platform isn’t just about the tech specs. Sure, that part matters, but once you’ve ticked the technical boxes, you’re not done. Next comes a critical decision: picking the right pricing model.

Why? Because it directly impacts your margins and determines how your business scales. Pick wrong, and you'll either lose money on heavy users or price out customers who just need basic syncing.

Merge charges per connected account. Predictable, but it gets expensive fast if customers want multiple connectors or sync frequently. Apideck charges per API call, so you pay for what you actually use. We also offer per-customer pricing if you want anticipated costs. The difference matters for your engineering decisions. Per-account pricing means you'll optimize for fewer connections. Usage-based pricing means customers can connect to as many platforms as they need and pull data whenever they want.

Your Unified API costs should match how customers actually use your product. In this article, we’re breaking down the major differences between account-based and call-based pricing so you can choose what works best for your use case.

Merge.dev’s Pricing Model Explained

Merge bills you based on Linked Accounts, which means each account your customer connects (e.g., NetSuite, BambooHR, Xero) is a paid connection.

  • $650/month covers up to 10 Linked Accounts

  • After that, it’s $65/month per additional linked account

merge pricing

Whether your customer sends 1 request or 100,000, you still pay the same. You’re charged for the existence of the connection, not what it does.

Example:

  • 10 customer connections → $650/month

  • 20 connections → $1,300/month

  • 50 connections → $3,250/month

It adds up fast. And the price scales whether your customers use it heavily or barely at all.

(Merge may offer volume-based discounts depending on usage or contract terms)

How Apideck Handles Usage

Apideck does it differently.

We charge based on actual API call volume, not on how many customers you connect or how many integrations you offer.

  • Launch plan: $299/month or $269/month billed annually

  • Includes access to 1 Unified API (e.g., Accounting, CRM, HRIS)

  • All connectors in that category are included (e.g., Xero, QuickBooks, Sage)

  • 10,000 API calls/month included

apideck pricing

You’re only billed for what gets used. No connection limits. No per-customer penalties.

Let’s Break It Down with Real Examples

Startup with Light Usage

  • 10 customers

  • Each connects to 2 integrations

  • 500 API calls per integration/month → 10,000 total calls

Merge: $1300/month → $15,600/year

Apideck: $269/month (annual) → $3,228/year

Savings: $12,372/year

Growing SaaS Platform

  • 25 customers

  • 2 integrations each

  • ~50,000 API calls/month

Merge: 25 linked accounts (+2 integrations for each) = $3,250/month → $39,000/year

Apideck (Growth plan): $539/month billed annually → $6,468/year

Savings: $32,532/year

When Merge's Model Might Make Sense

Not every use case favors usage-based pricing. If your product serves a small number of customers who generate extremely high volumes of API calls, Merge’s per-account model could be more cost-effective.

Let’s say you have 3 enterprise customers, each connecting once but syncing data millions of times per month.

With Merge, you will pay $650/month total.

With Apideck’s usage-based model, you might need a high-volume custom plan based on API call thresholds.

In that case, paying per connection—rather than per call—could save money.

But these edge cases are rare. Most SaaS companies, especially SMBs, grow by adding customers and offering more integrations.

What Our Data Shows: The Real API Usage of SMBs

Most companies don’t know how many API calls to expect from their customers until they’re deep into integration. That makes forecasting—and choosing the right pricing model—difficult.

So we did the work for them.

We analyzed usage data from hundreds of SMBs across industries over the past year. Here’s what we found:

  • Most companies use 1 API category (e.g., Accounting)

  • Their customers collectively generate around 50,000 API calls per month

With that profile in mind, here’s how Apideck compares to Merge:

Typical SMB Scenario (Based on Real Usage)

Setup:

  • 25 customers

  • Each connects to 2 integrations in 1 category

  • Total: 50 linked accounts, 50,000 API calls/month

Apideck:

  • Growth Plan → $599/month

  • Includes 2 Unified APIs + 50,000 API calls/month

  • Total: $7,188/year

Merge.dev:

  • 10 connections included → $650/month

  • 40 extra connections × $65 = $2,600/month

  • Total (month): $650 + $2,600 = $3,250/month

  • Total (year): $39,000/year

Net Savings with Apideck: $31,812/year

Practical Advantages of Usage-Based Pricing

Usage-based pricing aligns with how your product grows:

  • You’re charged for what’s used, not what’s connected

  • Adding more integrations doesn't increase cost

  • Pricing scales with adoption, not assumptions

  • Easy to budget, forecast, and optimize around

Whether you're onboarding 5 customers or 500, usage-based billing gives you the flexibility to scale without arbitrary penalties.

Debunking Common Myths About Usage-Based Pricing

“API call pricing is unpredictable”

There’s a perception that usage-based models lead to fluctuating bills and budgeting uncertainty. That can be true in edge cases, especially for products with spiky traffic or variable usage patterns. But for most SaaS platforms, API usage tends to follow consistent patterns once live. Apideck’s plans include generous call thresholds, and any overages are transparent and tiered. Instead of guessing how many users might connect, you scale pricing based on what’s actually used, which makes your costs more proportional and fair over time.

“Per-connection pricing is more predictable and easier to forecast.”

It’s true that charging per connection gives you fixed costs upfront. But that predictability often comes at the expense of flexibility and efficiency. You’ll pay the same regardless of whether customers use the integration actively or not. Usage-based pricing may require initial monitoring, but once baselines are established, it can offer clearer value alignment and better incentives to optimize integration performance.

“Flat pricing per account avoids surprise overages.”

Yes, flat pricing offers certainty—but it often favors the vendor, not the customer. You might be paying hundreds per connection even when usage is minimal. For companies serving smaller customers or offering integrations as a value-add rather than a core feature, usage-based pricing ensures you're only paying for what's consumed. That means more budget for growth, not waste.

“Charging per linked account better reflects customer value”

In some cases, such as low-volume, high-value integrations, per-account pricing may feel more intuitive. But most real-world use cases vary widely in traffic per account. One customer might connect two systems and barely touch them, while another might sync data thousands of times per day. API call pricing better mirrors actual backend load and engineering impact—so you're aligning cost with real value, not just theoretical usage.

Built to Scale Without Penalty

Pricing should reward product success, not punish platform adoption. With per-connection pricing, every new customer costs you—regardless of engagement. That forces you to make trade-offs: limit integrations, throttle features, or increase end-user pricing just to stay afloat.

With API call-based pricing, you don’t need to guess what customers might do. You only pay for what they actually use. That makes your pricing fair, predictable, and defensible.

Real-World Impact

Let’s say you're building a B2B SaaS product that integrates with Xero and QuickBooks. You’ve got 30 customers—most of them syncing data weekly. With Merge, you’re paying around $2,000/month whether they use it or not. With Apideck, you’re likely under the 50,000-call threshold and paying just $599/month on the Growth plan.

That’s not a small difference. That’s room to hire, reinvest, or extend your runway.

Merge.devApideck
Billing BasisPer Linked AccountAPI Calls (usage-based)
Base Price$650/month (up to 10 accounts)$299/month
Additional Cost$65 per linked accountNone per connector
Connector AccessPaid per connectionAll included in Unified API
Growth AlignmentFlat per connectionScales with actual usage

How Pricing Impacts Your Engineering Strategy

Your pricing model doesn’t only affect your finance team—it shapes engineering choices.

With customer-based and per-connection pricing:

  • You may discourage power users to avoid cost spikes

  • Engineers build custom throttling logic to stay under limits

  • You often delay integration rollouts to justify the cost

With usage-based pricing:

  • You optimize for value, not cost avoidance

  • Your team can release more integrations confidently

  • You maintain simple, predictable billing logic tied to actual traffic

Apideck’s usage-based model gives you that freedom. No engineering workarounds. No guessing games.

Prefer to Price by Customer? No Problem.

While usage-based billing gives you the most flexibility, we understand that some companies prefer to forecast based on active customer count. That’s why we offer a simple, transparent customer-based pricing model with no penalties for multi-integration use.

Here’s how it works:

  • You’re charged per active customer, not per integration.

  • Customers can use multiple API categories (e.g., CRM, HRIS, Accounting) without increasing your cost.

  • You can switch between usage-based and customer-based pricing anytime—test both, find what fits, and grow with confidence.

Transparent Customer-Based Plans

PlanCustomers IncludedPrice
Launch10$299/month
Growth25$599/month
Scale50$10,000/year
EnterpriseCustom volumeCustom pricing

There are no extra fees for integrations. Whether your customer connects to one API category or three, your cost doesn’t change. That means you can support more use cases, deliver more value, and stay in control of your margins.

Built to Evolve With You

What makes Apideck unique is flexibility. You’re not locked into a pricing model forever. If your product shifts or usage patterns change, you can move from call-based to customer-based billing—or back—without friction.

Bottom Line

No matter how you prefer to grow—by usage or by customer—you’re never paying for inactive connections, gated integrations, or fixed assumptions. You get one integration platform, two pricing models, and the freedom to choose what works best for your business.

In addition to competitive pricing, our platform stands out through distinct technical and experiential advantages. First, we deliver real-time data, minimizing latency and ensuring data freshness across integrations, which is an essential requirement for customers.

Second, we place a strong emphasis on developer experience. From robust SDKs and comprehensive documentation to streamlined onboarding and sandbox environments, everything is designed to reduce friction for engineers. This developer-first approach not only accelerates integration timelines but also strengthens retention among technical stakeholders evaluating platforms.

You don’t need to choose based on assumptions. With Apideck, you can test both models, compare real usage, and evolve with confidence. Read our guide on how to choose the best pricing model for your API strategy.

Apideck lets you move fast without running up the bill.

Want to see how this would apply to your product? Talk to us and we’ll run the numbers together.

Ready to get started?

Scale your integration strategy and deliver the integrations your customers need in record time.

Ready to get started?
Talk to an expert
Trusted by
Nmbrs
Benefex
Principal Group
Invoice2go by BILL
Trengo
MessageMedia
Lever
Ponto | Isabel Group
Apideck Blog

Insights, guides, and updates from Apideck

Discover company news, API insights, and expert blog posts. Explore practical integration guides and tech articles to make the most of Apideck's platform.

Understanding the security landscape of MCP
AIIndustry insights

Understanding the security landscape of MCP

This article dives deep into the current state of MCP security in 2025, covering real-world vulnerabilities like prompt injection, tool poisoning, and token exposure. You’ll learn about the biggest threats facing MCP implementations today, including exploits seen in GitHub, Supabase, and others—plus what the new OAuth 2.0-based security spec is doing to address them.

Saurabh Rai

9 min read
API Based RAG using Apideck’s Filestorage API, LangChain, Ollama, and Streamlit
AIFile StorageGuides & Tutorials

API Based RAG using Apideck’s Filestorage API, LangChain, Ollama, and Streamlit

This article walks through building a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline that goes beyond static vector stores. Instead of pre-indexed documents, it uses API-based retrieval to access live files from Box via Apideck’s unified file storage API. You'll see how to authenticate users securely with Vault, fetch and download files, and summarize them in real-time with a local LLM using LangChain and Ollama. Includes full code examples, project setup, and a working Streamlit UI to tie it all together.

Saurabh Rai

12 min read
APIs, MCPs, or Both? Choosing the Right AI Integration Stack
AIIndustry insights

APIs, MCPs, or Both? Choosing the Right AI Integration Stack

Trying to decide between APIs, MCPs, or both? This article breaks down how each option works, where they fall short, and how they can work together. It covers real integration challenges, the role of unified APIs, and what to consider when building AI-driven systems that are reliable and scalable.

Saurabh Rai

12 min read